{"id":729,"date":"2025-01-25T14:35:13","date_gmt":"2025-01-25T15:35:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/developeternal.com\/?p=729"},"modified":"2025-01-25T16:26:19","modified_gmt":"2025-01-25T16:26:19","slug":"prof-schlevogts-compass-%e2%84%96-10-chinas-silky-future-in-a-realigned-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/developeternal.com\/index.php\/2025\/01\/25\/prof-schlevogts-compass-%e2%84%96-10-chinas-silky-future-in-a-realigned-world\/","title":{"rendered":"Prof. Schlevogt\u2019s Compass \u2116 10: China\u2019s silky future in a realigned world"},"content":{"rendered":"
The country\u2019s road ahead looks increasingly bleak, but it has great countercyclical expansion potential via domestic and international rebalancing<\/strong><\/p>\n In a daring thought experiment, imagine just for a moment that you are the powerful president of the People\u2019s Republic of China (PRC). You are sitting next to a cozy fireplace in a mountain retreat, looking out of a panoramic window and musing about the \u2018Middle Kingdom<\/em>\u2019.\u00a0<\/em>What is your sweeping vista of China\u2019s current standing and what future do you envision for this dragon beyond the distant summits in a rapidly changing world, where conventional truth is apparently being pulverized at lightning speed?<\/p>\n At first sight, my dear president-in-thought, I admit that you could get easily depressed. Domestically, China has not fully recovered from the dystopian Covid-19 pandemic. The government is likely to have missed its growth target in 2024, with GDP projected to have increased by only 4.8% in that year. Even though many countries can only dream of such solid economic performance, this figure pales compared to an average growth rate of over 9% since the start of the Reform and Opening policy in 1978. China also faces tremendous internal structural problems, such as sectoral challenges in real estate, high youth employment and a worsening dependency ratio due to an aging population. Moreover, foreign direct investment into China is trending downwards, having declined by 30.4% in the first three quarters of 2024 compared to the previous year. In a nutshell, the stellar ascent of the Middle Kingdom since 1978 seems to be halted, at least for the time being.<\/p>\n To make things worse, mighty storm clouds are gathering quickly in the international arena. Increasingly, the so-called collective West is singling out China as its strategic enemy number one \u2013 a radical shift compared to the previous exuberant Sino-euphoria that culminated in a veritable China-mania, with Western bosses trying to outsmart each other when it came to giving favors to the country. Back then, one of the greatest fears of a typical CEO of a Western multinational company was not to go down in history as the company\u2019s leader who missed China.<\/p>\n Now, apart from a military buildup in the West that is directed against China, in the economic sphere, a ferocious trade war with the United States is looming. For example, President Donald Trump promised a tariff of up to 60% on all goods imported from the Middle Kingdom. He announced that on his first day in office, he will start by singling out China, which will need to pay an extra 10% on top of all the new tariffs he is going to impose on other countries.<\/p>\n This forebodes a significant drop in China\u2019s net exports (the difference between exports and imports), which are an important driver of demand-side GDP growth. To start with, the reason for the decrease of exports is simple: Chinese exports to the US, which account for 15% of China\u2019s total exports<\/a>, will become more expensive for American buyers, which is likely to lead to a decrease in demand for them. If China\u2019s imports do not drop as sharply as exports (possibly because many imported goods are vitally important to its economy), net exports will decrease.<\/p>\n Moreover, right in its front yard, North Korea, an important traditional ally of China, appears to be pivoting to Russia as its next key partner. This shift forms part of the megatrend of global realignment after the start of Russia\u2019s Special Military Operation in Ukraine in 2022, with Russia looking for new allies in the face of severe sanctions imposed by the collective West.<\/p>\n Not surprisingly, bearing in mind the manifold and grave domestic and international challenges, the future of China looks increasingly bleak to many observers, with China resembling a boxer who received several blows and is tumbling.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Yet in every crisis, there is upside potential for success, to be achieved by making nuanced and decisive distinctions. After all, the Chinese character for crisis contains two parts, that is, w\u00e9i<\/em> (\u5371), which stands for danger, and j\u012b<\/em> (\u673a), which signifies opportunity. Moreover, in ancient Greek, the word kr<\/em>\u00ed<\/em>sis<\/em> (\u03ba\u03c1\u03af\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2) literally denotes an act of separating and by extension a decision.<\/p>\n Leveraging these cross-cultural philological insights as mental and spiritual inspirations, the Chinese president can use the critical juncture to make important countercyclical distinctions and steer his ship of state into an opportunity-rich direction. The key to success is a smart and delicate balancing act at home and abroad in the service of various stakeholders in the national and global socio-economic ecosystem. In this regard, the outside challenges in particular\u00a0\u2013 rather than being harbingers of doom\u00a0\u2013 can serve as powerful catalysts to bring about the necessary transformation because they tend to imbue decisionmakers with a strong sense of urgency. As a rather ironic unintended consequence, the hostile agenda of China\u2019s powerful external enemies may thus be confounded.<\/p>\n As an initial step, China\u2019s leader should sharpen his focus on transformative domestic policies, strengthening China internally and thus improving its ability to resiliently cope with crises induced from the outside. The main leverage point in this regard is restructuring the composition of GDP from investment-driven to consumption-driven growth.<\/p>\n Out of the four components of GDP calculated by the expenditure method on the demand side of the economy\u00a0\u2013 that is, consumption, investment, government expenditure and net exports\u00a0\u2013 the key driver of China\u2019s economic miracle after the start of the Reform and Opening policies was investment, funded by an above-average domestic saving rate.<\/p>\n In recent times, this particular growth engine has become problematic, though, mainly due to the following factors: First, there are declining marginal returns on every extra unit of investment. Furthermore, according to the so-called Solow growth model, depreciation increases when the capital stock rises. This can potentially lead to a point beyond the steady-state level of capital where depreciation will be higher than investment, which means that the capital stock will actually decrease<\/a>. Moreover, the Solow model shows that in the long-run equilibrium, the growth of income per worker<\/em> is not driven by capital and labor, but only by the rate of technological progress<\/a>, all of which are supply-side factors.<\/p>\n Moreover, high investment comes at the expense of consumption inside China, which is significantly lower than in many advanced economies. In contrast, rebalancing GDP towards higher domestic consumption, ceteris paribus<\/em>, would imply that Chinese citizens would come to enjoy to a greater extent the fruits of economic growth. Important policy tools for bringing about such a shift include tax cuts and transfer payments to consumers. While China tried to promote domestic consumption at certain points in the past, more efforts need to be undertaken in this respect in the future.<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n As we have seen, the key to sustainable increases in living standards in the long run is rising productivity due to technological progress on the supply-side of the economy. In this regard, the Chinese president should embrace innovative private entrepreneurs, who in recent years, to some extent, have become the lightning rod and scapegoat for many of China\u2019s socio-economic problems. In particular, it should be recalled that the art of Chinese management practiced in the private sector explains much of China\u2019s economic miracle, as demonstrated by rigorous empirical research<\/a>. Among other things, the stellar performance of the Middle Kingdom resulted from the high rate of innovation achieved by private enterprises, which is an important driver of technological progress. Apart from the domestic opportunities, possibly even greater untapped countercyclical expansion potential lurks in the international arena, though.<\/p>\n The first Chinese character of the word for China is zh\u014dng<\/em>\u00a0(\u4e2d), which means center.<\/em>\u00a0This lexical artifact corroborates that the dominant logic and formative paradigm of Chinese leaders for several millennia has been to regard their empire as the core, implying that other states merely constitute the periphery. To succeed in the global area, though, China needs to fully leverage the power of transnational win-win partnerships, replacing its accustomed centripetal world view with a paradigm-breaking advanced polycentric perspective.<\/p>\n The key catalyst for achieving this transformative purpose is to build what I call a \u201cmulticentric new silk road\u201d<\/em> in a realigning world. In this context, the current challenges are a blessing in disguise for China, since they provide the country with the stimulus to channel its main efforts to countries with great growth potential that currently are not subject to the diktat of the collective West, or at least can be wooed away from it.<\/p>\n A Chinese proverb says that if you want to get rich, you should build a road first. China\u2019s paramount leader, Xi Jinping, seems to have heeded this advice when he spearheaded the building of a New Silk Road<\/em>\u00a0(also called the Belt and Road<\/em>\u00a0initiative) in 2013. The essence of this project was to finance huge infrastructure projects in over 150 countries around the globe to link the Middle Kingdom with a wide variety of international trading partners. In contrast to many Western countries who are keen to give moral sermons, China, to put it succinctly, gave airports, not lectures to host countries. While this geostrategic program clearly helped to improve the growth prospects of many countries that obtained funding from China, it often resulted in bad debt and the need for China to restructure loans.<\/p>\n Moving ahead, China needs to learn how to function as a peace-inducing stabilizer, powerful integrator and inspiring orchestrator in a realigning world. This implies that its movers and shakers need to play the leading part not only in binary relations, but also in vitally important multilateral networks, including the envisaged polycentric New Silk Road<\/em>.<\/p>\n Given China\u2019s long history of focusing on internal affairs rather than expanding internationally (apart from the earlier expansions of its empire), it has not yet fully developed the cross-cultural mindset and multilateral skills needed for achieving transnational excellency.<\/p>\n As regards the boundary-spanning mindset, the country should move away from the \u2018Chinatown\u2019<\/em>\u00a0paradigm of isolated and self-contained ethnic communities abroad and strive for full immersion in foreign countries without giving up its identity. Moreover, a good national role model for the skills needed to serve as stabilizer, integrator and orchestrator in transnational webs is Germany, which, at least in the past, managed to play a leading political role and prosper economically at the center of the European Union (EU). In contrast to Germany, though, which has made the error of sacrificing national sovereignty and giving away huge sums of money to self-centered \u201cpartners\u201d<\/em> without commensurate returns, China should act on the basis of national autonomy in decision making and invest only in profitable projects. Importantly, it needs to continue to respect the sovereignty of its international partners instead of trying to outsmart them through multilateral brinksmanship.<\/p>\n Applied to the New Silk Road<\/em>, the new polycentric development paradigm means, for example, that China, when financing overseas infrastructure projects, should increasingly take other lenders on board in a collegial fashion \u2013 especially actors that belong to the rapidly expanding BRICS alliance \u2013 instead of acting alone and assuming all risks. In doing so, China should strive for great transparency and authenticity with respect to its objectives and methodology, clearly separating politics from business. It should also adopt a more targeted approach with clear strategic priorities instead of a shotgun-type modus operandi<\/em>. For example, China should consider focusing more on directly investing in promising foreign countries on the basis of sound risk assessments rather than mainly relying on lending funds, which in the past tended to be channeled especially to high-risk countries.<\/p>\n1. Current situation: Domestic and international trouble<\/h2>\n
2. The road ahead: Balance as the key guiding principle<\/h2>\n
a. Domestic rebalancing: From investment to consumption<\/h3>\n
b. International rebalancing: The \u2018BMB<\/em>\u2019 axis along a multicentric silk road<\/h3>\n