{"id":4597,"date":"2025-06-30T17:02:51","date_gmt":"2025-06-30T17:02:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/developeternal.com\/?p=4597"},"modified":"2025-06-30T17:17:11","modified_gmt":"2025-06-30T17:17:11","slug":"intel-suggests-us-strikes-on-iran-caused-limited-damage-wapo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/developeternal.com\/index.php\/2025\/06\/30\/intel-suggests-us-strikes-on-iran-caused-limited-damage-wapo\/","title":{"rendered":"Intel suggests US strikes on Iran caused limited damage \u2013 WaPo"},"content":{"rendered":"
Intercepted conversations show that Tehran officials expected a worse impact from the attacks on nuclear facilities<\/strong><\/p>\n US strikes on Iran\u2019s nuclear facilities were far less destructive than expected, according to intercepted communications between senior Iranian officials published by the Washington Post.<\/p>\n The strikes in question were part of a coordinated American-Israeli military campaign launched earlier this month. On June 13, the IDF began bombing Iranian targets, claiming that Tehran was close to being able to build nuclear weapons. The US joined the operation on June 22, targeting several Iranian nuclear facilities, including the underground Fordow site, which was struck using 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs.\u00a0<\/p>\n US President Donald Trump has claimed that the strikes \u201ccompletely and totally obliterated\u201d<\/em> Iran\u2019s nuclear program. CIA Director John Ratcliffe told lawmakers last week that several key sites had been completely destroyed and would take years to rebuild.<\/p>\n However, according to the intercepted conversations described to the Post by four sources familiar with the intelligence, Iranian officials have been speculating as to why the strikes did not cause greater damage.<\/p>\n The Trump administration has not denied the existence of the intercepted calls, but officials have flatly rejected their significance.\u00a0<\/p>\n