{"id":2163,"date":"2025-02-08T14:56:57","date_gmt":"2025-02-08T15:56:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/developeternal.com\/?p=2163"},"modified":"2025-02-08T16:28:06","modified_gmt":"2025-02-08T16:28:06","slug":"critical-race-theory-is-more-insidious-than-even-most-conservatives-realize","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/developeternal.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/08\/critical-race-theory-is-more-insidious-than-even-most-conservatives-realize\/","title":{"rendered":"Critical race theory is more insidious than even most conservatives realize"},"content":{"rendered":"
The much-maligned ideology is not \u201cradical\u201d or \u201cleft-wing\u201d \u2013 it\u2019s a tool of elitist control<\/strong><\/p>\n In a recent post, right-wing social commentator and former academic Matt Goodwin announced that he had \u201cjust exposed how the British Psychological Society (BPS) had been captured by ‘anti-racist racists’.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n This post is the latest in a series in which Goodwin reveals that various institutions in the UK (including the BBC and the NHS) had been \u201cfully captured by radical if not extreme ideologies.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/p>\n One might nitpick over the term \u201cradical\u201d<\/em> \u2013 but if Goodwin is saying that most powerful institutions in Britain are dominated by woke postmodern ideologies, one can readily agree with him.\u00a0<\/p>\n Goodwin\u2019s latest post \u2013 by citing numerous telling passages from BPS publications \u2013 shows beyond a doubt that the BPS has adopted wholesale the postmodern ideology known as \u201ccritical race theory.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n Goodwin appears shocked by his discovery \u2013 but it should not surprise anyone interested in the development of the ideology of critical race theory over the past five decades to find that a professional institution like the BPS has been infected by it.<\/p>\n The march of various postmodern ideologies through universities and other institutions in the West commenced in the late 1960s in the United States, and has intensified exponentially since then \u2013 and the literature analyzing this phenomenon (both academic and popular) is vast.\u00a0<\/p>\n It would have been more surprising if Goodwin had discovered that the BPS did not embrace and promulgate critical race theory.\u00a0<\/p>\n \n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n But Goodwin\u2019s apparent naivety does not end there. Instead of engaging in a critical analysis of the phenomenon that he has discovered, he remains content to draw the trite conclusion that critical race theory is \u201cracist\u201d<\/em> and that those who adhere to it are \u201cracists\u201d<\/em> \u2013 without, however, defining either term.<\/p>\n In arguing in this way, Goodwin has adopted precisely the same mode of intellectual disputation practiced by those postmodern ideologues that he (correctly) criticizes and condemns. Goodwin himself has no doubt been branded a \u201cracist\u201d<\/em> by these very same woke intellectuals.<\/p>\n Goodwin, just like his intellectual opponents, is satisfied with having reached this purely judgmental conclusion, which allows him to morally condemn the purveyors and adherents of critical race theory.<\/p>\n Goodwin seems not to realize that this form of ad hominem moral censure is precisely the same as that engaged in ad nauseam<\/em> by those supposedly \u201cradical ideologues\u201d<\/em> that Goodwin has spent the best part of his career denouncing.<\/p>\n One must also point out a further error in his analysis that renders his conclusions perfunctory at best \u2013 like many right-wing critics of Western societies, he wrongly believes that postmodern ideologies \u00a0(like critical race theory) are \u201cradical\u201d<\/em> or \u201cleft-wing\u201d<\/em> ideologies.<\/p>\n This, of course, is not the case.<\/p>\n These ideologies \u2013 and they include catastrophic climate change, diversity politics, #MeToo feminism and transgender rights, as well as critical race theory \u2013 are, in fact, deeply conservative, especially in their economic and political effects.<\/p>\n These ideologies emerged in the 1970s and have since come to prevail in most Western societies \u2013 although they are now coming under increased attack from populist political movements. They constitute the ideological means whereby the newly emerged global elites \u2013 who now effectively rule most Western nations \u2013 maintain their economic and cultural dominance.<\/p>\n To see these ideologies as \u201cradical\u201d<\/em> of \u201cleft-wing\u201d<\/em> \u2013 in the sense that they are adhered to by groups within society that seek to fundamentally challenge the existing economic order \u2013 is to completely misunderstand them.<\/p>\n In fact, once any of these ideologies is adopted, it is absolutely impossible to make a genuinely radical critique (in the traditional left-wing sense) of any aspect of contemporary Western societies.\u00a0<\/p>\n Even a cursory glance at those groups within society that fervently embrace these ideologies \u2013 including academia, large corporations, the judiciary, the public service and the majority of centrist politicians \u2013 proves conclusively their deep conservative import.<\/p>\n Can it seriously be suggested that any of these groups want to radically disrupt the current global economic order that each of them so blatantly and avariciously benefits from financially and status-wise?<\/p>\n Goodwin\u2019s own analysis of the elite coalition of interest groups that opposed Brexit tooth and nail makes it clear that the Remainer movement sought to preserve the existing global economic order, rather than overturn it.<\/p>\n